
Key Judgments
Here are some of the significant decisions shaping the landscape of dispute resolution in India. These precedents, drawn from courts and tribunals across the country, reflect the evolving law on arbitration, real estate, SARFAESI, insolvency, civil and commercial disputes, and are updated as the field develops.
M/s Sahasra Gastroenterology and Obesity Clinic Pvt. Ltd. v. Dr. Jaya Balasundaram - kar hc
An MoU and a subsequent Reconstitution Deed forming one commercial arrangement are arbitrable as a single transaction. A plausible arbitral view cannot be reopened under Sections 34 and 37.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7480833117298016256/
Nagreeka Indcon Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Cargocare Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. - sc
An arbitration clause stating disputes "can" be settled by arbitration does not create a binding obligation under Section 7. "Can" denotes possibility, not compulsion.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7479753558192472064/
Smt. Tirumala Sailikitha v. Smt. Prabhijit Dhariwal - kar hc
Karnataka's 120-day written statement forfeiture rule applies only to suits filed on or after 5 June 2025. Suits instituted earlier remain governed by the unamended Order VIII Rule 1 CPC.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7478387691907379200/
Habban Shah v. Sheruddin - sc
A conditional decree for specific performance is self-operative: failure to deposit the balance consideration in time, without seeking extension, results in automatic dismissal, and a belated deposit cannot revive the decree.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7474680085929963520/
Narasimha Murthy v. Mallesh - kar hc
A partition claim cannot survive when the foundational sale deed remains unchallenged. With a registered 1944 deed disclosed by the plaintiffs' own documents, the suit was ex facie time-barred under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7473655138667094016/
SARFARAZ MUNAF V. SIRAJ UMMER & ORS. - kar hc
Framing a partnership dispute as a personal loan does not defeat a mandatory arbitration reference under Section 8. Section 69 of the Partnership Act bars suits, not a defensive Section 8 application.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7468157115568689152/
Manju Reddy v. State of Karnataka - kar hc
A road proposed in the Master Plan cannot justify denial of a building sanction where no acquisition has commenced. Under Article 300A, property rights cannot be restricted absent authority of law.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7467089044200390656/
Mallikarjuna v. P. Sridhara - kar hc
An arbitration clause in a partnership deed does not extend to disputes arising from a subsequent settlement deed. The arbitration clause perished by novation.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7461988973075337216/
Komtech Plastic Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Zrii Technologies Inc. - kar hc
Assignment cannot revive a debt already time-barred under the Limitation Act, 1963, and share transfers remain bound by the company's Articles of Association.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7460554928697053184/
Smt. Savitha Pai v. Regional Commissioner & Ors. - kar hc
Stamp duty on a long-term lease cannot be assessed mechanically on market value alone; restrictive covenants limiting use and enjoyment must be factored into valuation.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7452596728333172737/
Mantri Tranquil Apartments Owners Association v. BBMP - KAR HC
Planning approvals and occupancy certificates cannot shield construction over stormwater drains from removal. Public interest in drainage infrastructure prevails over private property rights.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7449312979562438656/
KNK Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Modern Asset - KAR HC
An arbitration agreement survives the conclusion of CIRP and an NCLT-approved Resolution Plan under the IBC. Substantive defences fall outside the Section 11 court's remit.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7447912171134451712/
N. Jayaram v. B.R. Ramaswamy Gowda - KAR HC
Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act can be invoked only where the applicant admits the arbitration agreement and seeks reference; it cannot be invoked while disputing the agreement itself.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7444956729513013248/
Bhagyalakshmi Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Babaldas Amtharam Patel - SC
A surety stands discharged when the lender enlarges the risk beyond the sanction. A creditor's own conduct that prejudices the surety's remedy releases the surety.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7444250181023416320/
Smt. Kavalkunte Geetha Bhavani & Ors. v. Sri N.A. Krishnamurthy & Ors. - KAR HC
Subsequent purchasers holding registered sale deeds must be impleaded in specific performance suits.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7441695249225318400/
Smt. Rashmi v. HDFC Bank Limited - KAR HC
The Court set aside an arbitral award on grounds of limitation and patent illegality, holding the claim for refund of a security deposit was time-barred.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7440608081258131456/
ITW Consulting Private Limited v. Intellicomm Solutions and Enterprises Private Limited - KAR HC
Section 34 cannot be invoked against incidental preliminary orders in arbitration; challenges lie only against awards.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7439883330415697920/
M/S. SOBHA LIMITED VS. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY & ORS. - KAR HC
The Court clarified the position on parallel apartment bodies in residential projects, in a matter where the firm represented the Apartment Owners' Association.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7439208160269168640/
Sustainability Healthcare Solutions Ltd. v. BBMP & ORS. - KAR HC
Fresh arbitration can proceed after an award is set aside without issuing a new Section 21 notice.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7434819407186653184/
Sriganesh Chandrasekaran & Ors. v. M/s Unishire Homes LLP & Ors. - SC
The Court clarified the liability of landowners in joint development delays.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7432273150966669312/
C. Velusamy v. K. Indhera - SC
A Section 29A extension can be granted even after expiry of the arbitrator's mandate and delivery of a delayed award.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7431729682967982080/
Vayyaeti Srinivasarao v. Gaineedi Jagajyothi - SC
Pre-existing tenant possession does not convert an Agreement to Sell into a deemed conveyance.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7430461209918885888/
Jagdeep Chowgule v. Sheela Chowgule & Ors. - SC
A Section 29A extension application must be filed before the "Court" as defined in the Act, not the appointing High Court.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7429398299616452608/
Mr. V. Saravanakumar v. Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru Urban District - KAR HC
Recovery certificates issued by K-RERA under Section 40 of the RERA Act must be executed by revenue authorities.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7426471075422826496/
CHANDERAKANT & ANR. V. GYANOBA (DECEASED) BY LRS & ORS. - KAR HC
A registered sale deed is not invalidated merely by an incorrect survey number where the property's identity is otherwise clear.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7423930774682406912/
M.V. OMNI PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD. V. UNION OF INDIA & ORS - DEL HC
Unilateral appointment of an ineligible arbitrator is void ab initio absent an express written waiver under Section 12(5).
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7422497186631843840/
S S Trading Company v. SNC Trading company - BOM HC
An arbitrator who suspends proceedings over fee disputes allows the mandate to lapse and can be replaced under Section 11.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7401470188807974912/
Poly Medicure Ltd. v. Brillio Technologies Pvt. Ltd. - SC
A company purchasing software to automate core business processes does so for a commercial purpose and does not qualify as a "consumer" under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7398586487904112640/
MITC Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. M/s. Renuka Realtors & Ors - SC
Orders rejecting a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, being decrees, are appealable to the Commercial Appellate Division under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7394632567552995328/

Stay Informed
Stay Ahead
For an in-depth analysis, detailed insights and latest updates on key judgments and legal developments, follow our LinkedIn page ​